As requested in this thread im asking the community for Feedback regarding my 2.0 proposal.
I will not tolerate flames, stupid comments or anything that has no value to this topic. We had enough of this in the other Bard 2.0 etc threads that i deleted.
Thanks!
Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Item Change -> Reload needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Hiya,
Just asking for clarifications
Does War 2.0 clicky 6K is still a group buff?
If yes, does the monk 2.0 effect 5K5 HP stack with war 2.0 buff?
Thanks
Just asking for clarifications
Does War 2.0 clicky 6K is still a group buff?
If yes, does the monk 2.0 effect 5K5 HP stack with war 2.0 buff?
Thanks
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
If it did stack before, it will stack now.
It's still a group buff.
It's still a group buff.
Item Change -> Reload needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Is is it going to make a difference if the clicky is 6K or 3K on a warrior when your getting quadded for 15-20k a round?
As an example, last night it took us around 9 minutes to kill Vulak, if I had a clicky that made my hp 6K larger for 60 seconds with a 3 min reuse timer. it wouldnt have really made much of a difference to the fight as hopefully our healers would have been tuned enough to keep me alive regardless of an extra 6k or not. There was a chance obviously that the dodge or extra hp would have saved my rear, but I put enough faith in our healers that that doesnt happen
Im not complaining, just stating that I'd rather have seen it left with the effects it had on it, but maybe with a longer reuse duration (10-20 mins/longer?) than it has now if its concidered overpowered.
Since going from 1.5 to 2.0 I havent feel 'woot, now I can solo the server' it just felt like a nice upgrade along the epic path.
We are only at Tov/ST entry level, so my comments are based on our experiences of content upto and including there.
As an example, last night it took us around 9 minutes to kill Vulak, if I had a clicky that made my hp 6K larger for 60 seconds with a 3 min reuse timer. it wouldnt have really made much of a difference to the fight as hopefully our healers would have been tuned enough to keep me alive regardless of an extra 6k or not. There was a chance obviously that the dodge or extra hp would have saved my rear, but I put enough faith in our healers that that doesnt happen
Im not complaining, just stating that I'd rather have seen it left with the effects it had on it, but maybe with a longer reuse duration (10-20 mins/longer?) than it has now if its concidered overpowered.
Since going from 1.5 to 2.0 I havent feel 'woot, now I can solo the server' it just felt like a nice upgrade along the epic path.
We are only at Tov/ST entry level, so my comments are based on our experiences of content upto and including there.
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
It is possible to change the duration from 60 secs to 120 secs but then we also have to increase the recast from 180 secs to 500 or something similar. (120 secs + 40% bene focus = 168 secs x 3 = 504 secs)
What i want to achieve is that once you click the epic, you instantly feel powerful, so i'd rather tweak the 6k to 10k etc.
What i want to achieve is that once you click the epic, you instantly feel powerful, so i'd rather tweak the 6k to 10k etc.
Item Change -> Reload needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
As for the enchanter 2.0 how about something that would reduce the mobs resist checks for AEs etc?
What I mean is say a mob requires 300 fire to resist, once debuffed with this, its AE/Spell then requires 250 instead? (just example numbers).
Unsure of how this would translate post ToV though.
What I mean is say a mob requires 300 fire to resist, once debuffed with this, its AE/Spell then requires 250 instead? (just example numbers).
Unsure of how this would translate post ToV though.
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Do you mean a mob has an AE with a resist adjust to 300 and after the 2.0 click it has a -250 check only?
Im afraid that even though its a good idea, it's not currently doable with the effects at hand. We kinda do the reverse thing with resist buffs and Form of Resistance effects.
Im afraid that even though its a good idea, it's not currently doable with the effects at hand. We kinda do the reverse thing with resist buffs and Form of Resistance effects.
Item Change -> Reload needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Another point about changes between bard & shamy (which are closed). Bard did get the major changes compared to shamy (got a Up)
As shamy is designed for melee and still keeps the hp regen, Is it possible to add a Mana regen (which stacks with chanty buffs) on Bard 2.0 which is designed for casters?
My point is that the loss of HP regen on bard 2.0 will need to support more healing (so more mana from healers). Bard 2.0 could also be usefull for priest class.
PS: I ll go with more ideas on the Chanty 2.0 topic.
As shamy is designed for melee and still keeps the hp regen, Is it possible to add a Mana regen (which stacks with chanty buffs) on Bard 2.0 which is designed for casters?
My point is that the loss of HP regen on bard 2.0 will need to support more healing (so more mana from healers). Bard 2.0 could also be usefull for priest class.
PS: I ll go with more ideas on the Chanty 2.0 topic.
Re: Feedback for 2.0 Clicks Thread
Good idea on the Bard Mana regen. I will update it.
Item Change -> Reload needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Spell Change -> Reload AND new Spellfile needed
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest