I see. I'll keep my reports to the most obvious and egregious errors, like spells being shown as 'zero' damage or with flatly impossible/nonsensical amounts (like, say, 0-6 on a level 70 DD spell).
I still believe stun amounts should be listed. They're an important deciding factor in whether or not to actually bother using ice at all early on. I know I would've used ice a lot more if I could find a nice, fast-casting ice spell with a little stun on it to help me get a root off.
Anyway, looking through my Shadowknight's spell list, I came across these gems...
Aura of Pain: Spell description states a duration of 0:00:00. While the DD
itself is indeed instant, the
recourse spell that gives you armor class in exchange for the DD lasts 0:01:12.
Suggested Description: "Invokes severe pain in your target, causing 200 damage, and then uses that energy to greatly increase your armor class for 0:01:12."
Drained Soul: Spell has no description.
Suggested Description: "Drains your target of life energy, siphoning between (MINIMUM) and (MAXIMUM) damage."
EDIT: Going through wizard spells again, found another one...
Storm of Chaos: Spell lacks a description.
Suggested description: "Produces a storm of chaotic flames around the user, causing 4500 damage."
Revenge of the EDIT: Couple more from the wizard spell list.
Protection of Calrena: Spell description states that the spell consumes a peridot when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a peridot.
Manaskin: Spell description states that the spell consumes a peridot when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a peridot.
Diamondskin: Spell description states that the spell consumes a peridot when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a peridot.
Steelskin: Spell description states that the spell consumes a jasper when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a jasper.
Leatherskin: Spell description states that the spell consumes a bloodstone when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a bloodstone.
Shieldskin: Spell description states that the spell consumes a cat's eye agate when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a cat's eye agate.
Spellshield: Spell description states that the spell consumes a peridot when cast. It doesn't.
Suggested description: Remove the line about consuming a peridot.
Ether Ward: Spell consumes a peridot, but the spell description makes no mention of it.
Suggested description: Add the sentence, "Consumes a peridot when cast."
NOTE: Lots of oddities here with spell descriptions. Most of these spells state they consume some sort of gem when cast, but there are a few spells of the same line that do not say they consume anything. In reality, only one spell of these lines actually consumes a gem; Ether Ward.